In addition to your primary punishment, the court may impose a fine around the offender. The fine’s amount is for the discretion in the court and is intended to serve as an additional deterrent.
Online access to civil and criminal cases in select circuit courts. Cases could be searched by locality using name, case number, or hearing date.
Therefore, this petition is found being not maintainable which is dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners may request remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
Even though there isn't any prohibition against referring to case legislation from a state other than the state in which the case is being listened to, it holds little sway. Still, if there is no precedent inside the home state, relevant case legislation from another state could be thought of by the court.
It is currently nicely-settled that considerations for pre-arrest and post-arrest bail are totally different, therefore, in our view the learned Judge experienced fallen in error to cancel the bail allowed to petitioner because of the same Additional Sessions Judge.”
This is because transfer orders are typically deemed within the administrative discretion from the employer. However, there could be exceptions in cases where the transfer is determined by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, they may have grounds to challenge before the appropriate forum. Read more
96 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be effectively-settled that while thinking of the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority must take into account the advantage of every one of the suitable candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to these kinds of suitable candidates who are found to get most meritorious among them. Since the petitioner was held for being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked via the respondent department just to extend favor on the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy over the part of your respondent department.
The court cannot listen to the transfer order challenge since it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders retaining in view that one of many respondents has retired from service as pointed out through the counsel for the respondent university. twelve. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order concerning costs. Read more
nine. Needless to mention that any observations made check here in the above order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.
VI) The petitioner is at the rear of the bars considering the fact that arrest, investigation on the case is complete, he isn't any more necessary for that purpose of investigation and at this stage to help keep him behind the bars before summary of trial will provide no valuable purpose.
How much sway case regulation holds may perhaps change by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances on the current case. To examine this concept, look at the following case legislation definition.
This article delves into the intricacies of your recent amendment, accompanied by relevant case law, to supply a comprehensive understanding of its implications and functional applications.
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, as well as role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release for a legally regarded conviction. Read more
115 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance on the respondents that pensionary benefits can be withheld on account on the allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside our view, section twenty on the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does deliver for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. These include if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may very well be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension can be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension may very well be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set via the government.